Gauge IPL teams overall performance consistency using analytics (Cricket 2008 – 2015)

Sujeet Pillai

  1. May 04, 2015
  2. 4 min read
 

IPL Special Blog: Analyzing team performance

IPL season is upon us, and the madness is in full flow. Along with the IPL comes the inevitable discussions on
which team is better, who is more consistent, etc. Here at Incentius, we want to take an analytical stab at this
question. How can we compare teams across the matches that they've played? Note that we want to look at overall
consistency and not just win performance. If a team loses a close match, it should still be rated higher than a
team that lost a match by a big difference. Similarly, winning teams should get more credit if they have a big
victory as opposed to those who have won close victories.

Normalizing scores

The core question here is one of normalizing scores in a game. We'll do it on a scale of 0-1. For example, if the team
A defeats team B in a match, team A would get a 'performance metric' of say, 0.60 and team B would receive a
performance metric of 0.4 (Hence adding up to 1). The greater the extent of the victory, the higher team A's metric
would be, and the lower team B's metric would be. The normalizing to 1.0 ensures that every game is equally
weighted. This is the approach we choose to take. If we wanted to weigh each game differentially, say by how long
back that game was, we could do that as well. Or we could weigh each game by the total performance of both teams.
That would give high scoring matches a higher weightage than low-scoring matches.

Measuring the extent of performance

The second question is how we define the extent of the victory. Obviously, the number of runs scored by a team
should be part of it. Similarly, the total number of wickets lost in an inning should be part of it. So a team
that scores 150 in an inning by losing 5 wickets in 12 overs is better than a team that scores 150 in an inning
by losing 7 wickets in 12 overs.

Strategy for measurement

So what strategy should we use for such measurement? Let's use the Duckworth-Lewis method in a reverse fashion. The
The Duckworth-Lewis method is a statistical method that estimates the number of runs an average cricket team is

expected to make based on the resources they have. In cricket, the 'resources' are the number
of overs to be bowled and the number of wickets in hand. Essentially Duckworth-Lewis is a matrix that contains a number
of wickets in hand on one axis and the number of overs left to be bowled on the other axis. The matrix values of
intersecting points tell you how many runs the team is expected to make. Read more about the Duckworth-Lewis
method and its application on its Wikipedia
page

The Duckworth-Lewis method is primarily used for 50 overs matches. However, luckily for us, Rianka Bhattacharya,
Paramjit S. Gill and Tim B. Swartz have calculated the T20 table for the same in their paper, available here. Here is their table:

Overs/Wickets 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
20 1 0.969 0.93 0.879 0.813 0.722 0.599 0.448 0.297 0.176
19 0.956 0.909 0.877 0.83 0.769 0.683 0.565 0.42 0.272 0.153
18 0.917 0.867 0.829 0.787 0.732 0.654 0.542 0.402 0.257 0.139
17 0.877 0.823 0.789 0.738 0.697 0.628 0.522 0.387 0.246 0.128
16 0.835 0.782 0.753 0.705 0.664 0.602 0.503 0.374 0.235 0.12
15 0.792 0.743 0.709 0.669 0.626 0.574 0.484 0.362 0.227 0.112
14 0.751 0.707 0.673 0.637 0.593 0.546 0.464 0.35 0.218 0.105
13 0.715 0.674 0.636 0.603 0.562 0.515 0.443 0.338 0.21 0.098
12 0.683 0.637 0.602 0.568 0.529 0.475 0.419 0.326 0.202 0.091
11 0.65 0.599 0.566 0.533 0.497 0.439 0.393 0.313 0.194 0.085
10 0.613 0.56 0.526 0.501 0.46 0.408 0.361 0.3 0.186 0.079
9 0.579 0.523 0.479 0.461 0.425 0.378 0.331 0.283 0.177 0.072
8 0.54 0.483 0.443 0.417 0.389 0.349 0.302 0.261 0.167 0.066
7 0.493 0.442 0.402 0.374 0.354 0.321 0.272 0.234 0.157 0.059
6 0.417 0.385 0.357 0.33 0.317 0.29 0.242 0.2 0.145 0.052
5 0.362 0.334 0.31 0.286 0.273 0.255 0.215 0.17 0.122 0.044
4 0.308 0.28 0.261 0.241 0.224 0.207 0.183 0.142 0.1 0.035
3 0.254 0.228 0.211 0.194 0.177 0.165 0.144 0.116 0.079 0.025
2 0.197 0.172 0.155 0.141 0.127 0.119 0.106 0.093 0.062 0.016
1 0.137 0.113 0.097 0.085 0.073 0.067 0.06 0.052 0.042 0.009

Calculating performance

Now, how do we use the Duckworth-Lewis table to calculate performance for a match? What we're going to do is
calculate an 'effective score' for each team. i.e. if a team finished their innings without using up all of their
wickets and all of their overs, we're going to argue that they could have used those remaining overs & wickets
to score extra runs. The D/L table defines the number of extra runs they could have made.

Hence, if in an inning a team is all out or finished all 20 overs:

effective_score = actual_score

If however, a team still has wickets in hand and overs left to play:

effective_score = actual_score + extra runs(Wickets in hand/Overs left -> looked up on D/L Table)

Once the effective_score of each team is calculated, we calculate the performance metric by using:

performance_metric_team_a = team_a_effective_score/(team_a_effective_score + team_b_effective_score)

Analyzing performance

Now that we've calculated the performance metric of every team for every match let's ask the data questions.

Consistency

Which teams have been most consistent across 2008-2014?

Chennai is the highest, no surprises there. Mumbai comes in second. KKR, despite their two wins, are 5th, explained
by their dismal performance in 2009. Kings XI haven't won a single IPL but come in third.

* Note that Sunrisers Hyderabad and Deccan Chargers have been merged together.

Biggest Win

Which match had the greatest win in IPL history in terms of relative effective score? Funnily it seems the first
Every match of the IPL was the biggest victory. Remember Brendan
McCullum murdering the RCB attack

Kolkata Knight Riders 222/3 (20/20 ov); Royal Challengers Bangalore 82 (15.1/20 ov)
Performance Metric - KKR = 0.7302, RCB = 0.2697

Then comes the
the second match of IPL 2009
:

Royal Challengers Bangalore 133/8 (20/20 ov); Rajasthan Royals 58 (15.1/20 ov)
Performance Metric - RCB = 0.6963, RR = 0.3037

In third is the 1st
Semi-final of IPL 2008
:

Rajasthan Royals 192/9 (20/20 ov); Delhi Daredevils 87 (16.1/20 ov)
Performance Metric - RR = 0.6882, DD = 0.3118

Head-to-head performance

How do teams usually perform when pitted against each other.

It seems Chennai vs Delhi is the strongest performance in favour of Chennai. Next comes Chennai vs Hyderabad, also
in favour of Chennai. Third is Mumbai vs Kolkata in favour of Mumbai.

Hope you had as much fun reading this blog as we had writing it. Check out some of our other blogs at http://www.incentius.com/blog

Drop us a mail at info@incentius.com to get in touch. Also,, subscribe to this blog on the right to get future blog posts like this one.

 

About Author
Sujeet Pillai
As an experienced polymath, I seamlessly blend my understanding of business, technology, and science.

See What Our Clients Say

Mindgap

Incentius has been a fantastic partner for us. Their strong expertise in technology helped deliver some complex solutions for our customers within challenging timelines. Specific call out to Sujeet and his team who developed custom sales analytics dashboards in SFDC for a SoCal based healthcare diagnostics client of ours. Their professionalism, expertise, and flexibility to adjust to client needs were greatly appreciated. MindGap is excited to continue to work with Incentius and add value to our customers.

Samik Banerjee

Founder & CEO

World at Work

Having worked so closely for half a year on our website project, I wanted to thank Incentius for all your fantastic work and efforts that helped us deliver a truly valuable experience to our WorldatWork members. I am in awe of the skills, passion, patience, and above all, the ownership that you brought to this project every day! I do not say this lightly, but we would not have been able to deliver a flawless product, but for you. I am sure you'll help many organizations and projects as your skills and professionalism are truly amazing.

Shantanu Bayaskar

Senior Project Manager

Gogla

It was a pleasure working with Incentius to build a data collection platform for the off-grid solar sector in India. It is rare to find a team with a combination of good understanding of business as well as great technological know-how. Incentius team has this perfect combination, especially their technical expertise is much appreciated. We had a fantastic time working with their expert team, especially with Amit.

Viraj gada

Gogla

Humblx

Choosing Incentius to work with is one of the decisions we are extremely happy with. It's been a pleasure working with their team. They have been tremendously helpful and efficient through the intense development cycle that we went through recently. The team at Incentius is truly agile and open to a discussion in regards to making tweaks and adding features that may add value to the overall solution. We found them willing to go the extra mile for us and it felt like working with someone who rooted for us to win.

Samir Dayal Singh

CEO Humblx

Transportation & Logistics Consulting Organization

Incentius is very flexible and accommodating to our specific needs as an organization. In a world where approaches and strategies are constantly changing, it is invaluable to have an outsourcer who is able to adjust quickly to shifts in the business environment.

Transportation & Logistics Consulting Organization

Consultant

Mudraksh & McShaw

Incentius was instrumental in bringing the visualization aspect into our investment and trading business. They helped us organize our trading algorithms processing framework, review our backtests and analyze results in an efficient, visual manner.

Priyank Dutt Dwivedi

Mudraksh & McShaw Advisory

Leading Healthcare Consulting Organization

The Incentius resource was highly motivated and developed a complex forecasting model with minimal supervision. He was thorough with quality checks and kept on top of multiple changes.

Leading Healthcare Consulting Organization

Sr. Principal

US Fortune 100 Telecommunications Company

The Incentius resource was highly motivated and developed a complex forecasting model with minimal supervision. He was thorough with quality checks and kept on top of multiple changes.

Incentive Compensation

Sr. Director

Most Read
Scaling Data Analytics with ClickHouse

In the modern data-driven world, businesses are generating vast amounts of data every second, ranging from web traffic, IoT device telemetry, to transaction logs. Handling this data efficiently and extracting meaningful insights from it is crucial. Traditional databases, often designed for transactional workloads, struggle to manage this sheer volume and complexity of analytical queries.

Kartik Puri

  1. Nov 07, 2024
  2. 4 min read
From Pandas to ClickHouse: The Evolution of Our Data Analytics Journey

At Incentius, data has always been at the heart of what we do. We’ve built our business around providing insightful, data-driven solutions to our clients. Over the years, as we scaled our operations, our reliance on tools like Pandas helped us manage and analyze data effectively—until it didn’t.

The turning point came when our data grew faster than our infrastructure could handle. What was once a seamless process started showing cracks. It became clear that the tool we had relied on so heavily for data manipulation—Pandas—was struggling to keep pace. And that’s when the idea of shifting to ClickHouse began to take root.

But this wasn’t just about switching from one tool to another; it was the story of a fundamental transformation in how we approached data analytics at scale.

Chetan Patel

  1. Oct 28, 2024
  2. 4 min read
Designing Beyond Aesthetics: How UI Shapes the User Experience in Enterprise Solutions

UI design in enterprise solutions goes beyond aesthetics, focusing on enhancing usability and user satisfaction. By emphasizing clarity, visual hierarchy, feedback, and consistency, UI improves efficiency and productivity, allowing users to navigate complex tasks seamlessly.

Mandeep Kaur

  1. Oct 23, 2024
  2. 4 min read
How We Transformed the B2B Marketplace: From Struggle to Success

We recently undertook a comprehensive transformation of the B2B marketplace to address some pressing challenges

Mayank Patel

  1. Jul 29, 2024
  2. 4 min read